
(A) Adaptability (appearance + organization): relative equation

(B) Adaptability(appearance + variation): relative equation
-
Phenomenal relative adaptability (AD’) is supposed to be quantified supercomplexly by the third root of the product of phenomenal monocomplex relative appearance, i.e. relative energy times relative spacetime (fig. A & B), relative organization, i.e. relative structure times relative function (fig. A), and relative variation, i.e. relative material or chemical variability times relative thermal or electro-magnetic variety (fig. B) (see: figures above, adaptability//definition & ...//simple properties, and physical corre-lations (extract)//appearance (55), organization (56), variation (57) & adaptability (64)), or
AD’ = 3√(relative appearance x relative organization x relative variation)
= 3√((rel. energy x rel. spacetime volume)(rel. structure x rel. function)
(rel. chemical variability x rel. electromagnetic variety))
= 3√(((rel. mass x rel. temp.)(3D,3d-speed x 3d,3D-travel time))
((density x size)(intensity* x process time))
((charge x field strength)(conversion rate x conservation time)))
= 3√(((δm/∆T)(δT/∆m))((δl3/∆t3)(δt3/∆l3))((δm/∆l3)(δl3/∆m))
((δT/∆t3)(δt3/∆T))((δm/∆t3)(δt3/∆m))((δT/∆l3)(δl3/∆T)))**
= 1***
*Frequency (t-1) is supposed to be the unidirectional (1d) abstraction of any directional (3d) functional intensity (T/t3) (see: intensity & process time).
**Within closed systems, phenomenal (self-)adaptability is supposed to be constant (maintenance of self-adapt-ability).
***Ultimately, mathematical simplification by cancelling out yields '1', but, in addition, serious loss or relevant complex physical information as well.
Internet resources & literature references
©Memes Ltd.