Principles of Physical Complexity by Jos Koomen (Memes Ltd) - Complex Problem Solutions

 
Variation: simple quantifiers (left) & relative equation (right)

• Phenomenal relative variation (VR') is supposed to be a monocomplex property which is quantified by the product of its relative chemical variability or chemistry, i.e. conversion rate (δm/∆t³) times conservation time (δt³/∆m), and relative electromagnetic variety or electromagnetism, i.e. charge (δT/∆l³) times field strength (δl³/∆T) (see: figures above, variation//definition & ...//simple properties, and physical correlations (extract)//charge (34), field strength (38), conversion rate (41), conservation time (45) & variation (57)), or

                      VR' = relative chemical variability x relative electromagnetic variety
                             = (conversion rate x conservation time)(charge x field strength)
                             = ((δm/∆t³)(δt³/∆m))((δT/∆l³)(δl³/δT))*
                             = 1**

• Together, phenomenal monocomplex relative appearance, organization and variation are supposed to quantify phenomenal supercomplex relative adaptability (see also: variation//complex correlations & adaptability/relative equation).

*Within closed systems, phenomenal relative (self-)variation is supposed to be constant (maintenance of relative variation). If the case indeed, the former implies that phenomenal relative material or chemical variability will increase with decreasing relative thermal or electromagnetic variety, and decrease with increasing relative electromagnetic variety.
**Mathematical simplification by simple cancelling out yields ultimately '1', but, in addition, serious loss of relevant complex physical information as well.

Internet resources & literature references

• See: variation//definition & ...//quantifying simple properties

^©Memes Ltd.