Principles of Physical Complexity by Jos Koomen (Memes Ltd) - Complex Problem Solutions

 
Organization: simple quantifiers (left) & relative equation (right)

• Phenomenal relative organization (OR') is supposed to be quantified monocomplexly by the product of its simple relative structure, i.e. density (δm/∆l³) times size (δl³/∆m), and relative function, i.e. intensity (δT/∆t³), frequency (t^-1)* inclusive, times process time (δt³/∆T) (see: figures above, organization// definition & ...//simple properties, and physical correlations (extract)//density (20), size (23), intensity (27), process time (31) & organization (56)), or

                                         OR’ = relative structure x relative function
                                                = (density x size)(intensity x process time)
                                                = ((δm/∆l³)(δl³/∆m))((δT/∆t³)(δt³/∆T))**
                                                = 1^***

• Together, phenomenal monocomplex relative appearance, organization and variation are supposed to quantify phenomenal relative adaptability supercomplexly (see: organization//complex correlations & adaptability//relative equation).

*Frequency (t^-1) is thought to be the unidirectional (1d) abstraction of any directional (3d) functional intensity (t³) (see: intensity & process time).
**Within closed systems, phenomenal relative (self-)organization is supposed to be constant, (maintenance of relative organization). If the case indeed, the former implies that phenomenal relative structure will increase, i.e. will become increasingly rigid, with decreasing relative function, and decrease, i.e. become increasingly flexible, with increasing relative function.
***Mathematical simplification by simple cancelling out yields '1', but, in addition, serious loss of relevant complex physical information as well.

Internet resources & literature references

• See also: organization//definition & ...//quantifying simple properties

^©Memes Ltd.