Principles of Physical Complexity by Jos Koomen (Memes Ltd) - Complex Problem Solutions

 
Course: simple quantifiers (left) & relative equation (right)

• Phenomenal monocomplex relative course (CR’) is supposed to be quantified complexly by the square root of the product of phenomenal relative energy, i.e. relative mass (δm/∆T) times relative temperature (δT/∆m), and relative function, i.e. thermal intensity (δT/∆t³), frequency (t^-1)* inclusive, times process time (δt³/∆T), and relative chemical variability or chemistry, i.e. material conversion rate (δm/∆t³) times conservation time (δt³/∆m) (see: figures above, course//definition & ...//simple properties, and phdysical correlations (extract)// rel. mass (6), rel. temp. (9), intensity (34), process time (37), conversion rate (41), conservation time (44) & course (48)), or

         CR’ = √(relative energy x (relative function x relative chemical variability))     
              = √((relative mass x relative temperature)((intensity x process time)(conversion rate x
                      conservation time)))
               = √(((δm/∆T)(δT/∆m))(((δT/∆t³)(δt³/∆T))((δm/∆t³)(δt³/∆m))))**
               = 1***

• Together, phenomenal monocomplex relative coherence and relative course are thought to quantify phenomenal bicomplex relative energetic event-like character (see also: course//complex correlations & energetic eventuality//relative equation).

*Frequency (t^-1) is supposed to be the unidirectional (1d) abstraction of any directional (3d) functional intensity (T/t³) (see: intensity & process time).
**Within spaceless closed systems phenomenal relative course is thought to be constant (maintenance of relative course).
***Mathematical simplification by cancelling out yields ultimately '1', but, in addition, serious loss of relevant complex physical information as well.

Internet resources & literature references

• See: course//definition & & ...//quantifying simple properties

^©Memes Ltd.