Principles of Physical Complexity by Jos Koomen (Memes Ltd) - Complex Problem Solutions

  
Appearance: simple quantifiers (left) & relative equation (right)

• Phenomenal relative appearance (AP') is supposed to be quantified monocomplexly by the product of its relative energy, i.e. relative mass (δm/∆T) times relative temperature (δT/∆m), and relative spacetime volume,  i.e. 3D,3d-speed (δl³/∆t³) times 3d,3D-travel time (δt³/∆l³) (see: figures above, energy//... & spacetime//simple properties, appearance//definition & ...//simple properties & physical correlations (extract)//relative mass (6), relative temperature (9), 3D,3d-speed (13), 3d,3D-travel time (16) & appearance (55)), or

                  AP’ = (relative energy x relative spacetime volume)
                         = ((relative mass x relative temperature)(3D,3d-speed x 3d,3D-travel time))
                         = (((δm/∆T)(δT/∆m))((δl³/∆t³)(δt³/∆l³)))*
                         = 1**

• Together, phenomenal relative appearance, organization and variation are supposed to quantify phenomenal relative adaptability supercomplexly (see: appearance//complex correlations & adapt-ability//relative equation).

*Within closed systems, phenomenal relative energy and spacetime are supposed to be constant, and, due to that, phenomenal relative (self-)appearance as well (maintenance of relative energy, spacetime & appearance).
**Mathematical simplification by simple cancelling out yields '1', but, in addition, serious loss of relevant complex physical information as well.

Internet resources & literature references

• See: appearance/definition & ...//quantifying simple properties

^©Memes Ltd.