Principles of Physical Complexity by Jos Koomen (Memes Ltd) - Complex Problem Solutions

 
Coherence: simple quantifiers (left) & relative equation (right)

• Phenomenal relative coherence (CH') is supposed to be quantified complexly by the square root of the product of phenomenal relative energy, i.e. relative mass (δm/∆T) times relative temperature (δT/∆m), and relative structure, i.e. material density (δm/∆l³) times spatial size (δl³/∆m), and relative electro-magnetic variety or electromagnetism, i.e. thermal charge (δT/∆l³) times spatial field strength (δl³/∆T) (see: figures above, equation below, coherence//definition & ...//simple properties, and physical correlations (extract) //rel. mass (6), rel. temp. (7), density (20), size (23), charge (34), field strength (37) & coherence (47)), or

         CH’ = √(relative energy x (relative structure x relative electromagnetic variety))
                = √((relative mass x relative temperature)((density x size)(charge x field strength)))
                = √(((δm/∆T)(δT/∆m))(((δm/∆l³)(δl³/∆m))((δT/∆l³)(δl³/∆T))))*
                = 1**

• Together, phenomenal monocomplex relative coherence and relative course are supposed to quantify phenomenal bicomplex relative energetic event-like character (see: coherence//complex correlations & energetic eventuality//relative equation).

*Within timeless closed systems, phenomenal relative spatial coherence is thought to be constant (maintenance of relative course).
**Mathematical simplification by cancelling out yields ultimately '1', but, in addition, serious loss of relevant complex physical information as well.

Internet resources & literature references

• See: coherence//definition & ...//quantifying simple properties

^©Memes Ltd.